yonsei55 wrote:
hindi ko alam kung san mo nakuha to...pero EJK nga ang alleged sa DDS eh
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extrajudicial_killing
(1)
An extrajudicial killing is the killing of a person by governmental authorities without the sanction of any judicial proceeding or legal process. Extrajudicial punishments are mostly seen by humanity to be unethical, since they bypass the due process of the legal jurisdiction in which they occur.[citation needed] Extrajudicial killings often target leading political, trade union, dissident, religious, and social figures and are only those carried out by the state government or other state authorities like the armed forces or police, as extra-legal fulfillment of their prescribed role. This does not include cases where aforementioned authorities act under motives that serve their own interests and not the State's, such as to eliminate their complicity in crime or commissioning by an outside party
(2)
Section 3(a) of the United States Torture Victim Protection Act contains a definition of extrajudicial killing:
a deliberate killing not authorized by a previous judgement pronounced by a regular constituted court affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples. Such term, however, does not include any such killing that, under international law, is lawfully carried out under the authority of a foreign nation.
-------------------
yonsei55 wrote:
kaya ko tinanong yung pakinabang ni duterte sa dds, hindi ba pwdeng yun rin ang pakinabang nya sa pagpatay kay espinosa?
hindi ko nga alam eh.
tignan mo both sides.
1. de5. kung si de5 ay drug lord at sabi tetestigo saw si espinosa laban sa kanya. 1 less problem kay De5
dito humaba yung usapan namin ni parokyano. yung salitang Kung. kung lang naman.
2. du30. kung si du30 ay drug lord. 1 less prolem sa kanya kasi baka si espinosa ang tumestigo laban sa kanya.
sa tingin mo sino drug lord sa 2.
yonsei55 wrote:
kaw na rin may sabi na somewhat tricky yung reason mo regarding dds eh. na kelangan mo pa iexplain kung bakit hindi mo sya binoto dahil sa dds.
and nabanggit naman na ni sir parokyano yung gusto ko sanang sabihin...
mahirap kasing paniwalaan na you're not leaning towards delima kasi nagbigay ka nga ng pakinabang ni delima while kay duterte wala?! saka there's really a big difference between sa nagtatanong dahil hindi nya talaga alam ang sagot...sa nagtatanong na may gustong ipahiwatig...parang yung tanong lang din na "eh sino pa nga ba?"
sa huli kung sino man ang nasa likod nyan, accountable pa rin sila bato dyan. nasa custody na nila eh.
p.s. mag kakilala pala kayo personally?! konting lamig lang ng ulo ha
eto yung buong quote na nakapagliwanag sa maling intindi ni parokyano
SirZap wrote:eh ikaw ang umaatake , ikaw ang may personal dyan... ikaw ang nao-offend...
at kung basa mo flip-flop, eh sorry, pero hindi ya flip-flop... naghahanap ka lang ng multo
wala kong in-imply na si De5. bakit ko pa sya iimply eh pwede naman akong dumeretcho
pwede ko naman sabihing Si "De5 nagpapatay nyan" ...eh di tapos
basahin mong maige " so KUNG kay De-5 naman eh syempre KUNG sya nga ang may pakana eh di 1 less problem sa kanya"
2 yung KUNG...
unang KUNG ... ok yan yung katumbas ng "Kung si Du30 blah blah blah..."
2nd na KUNG... "KUNG sya nga ang may pakana eh di 1 less problem sa kanya",
natural na kapag ikaw may pakana, assumed na makikinabang ka at assumed na ikaw ang drug lord or kasabwat ka nya
at assumed na rin na KUNG hindi ikaw na may pakana eh bale hindi ikaw ang drug lord
alangan magpakana ka na hindi ka naman drug lord o kasabwat
kailangan ko bang i-outline sa iyo yan?
kita mo mali mo
spin mo na naman yan
-------
... accountablity ni Bato, oo, kaso nga anong parusa sa kanya?
---------
magkakilala kami ni parokyano, talagang ganyan lang kami mag-post.
hindi lang nagkintindihan, hindi ko lang kasi matumbok agad anong part ang hindi nya naintindihan.
.. and wow, si BBM may interview sa ABS CBN pero as expected mas mahaba pa rin ang airtime ng mga dilaw 
